Conservation social science: Understanding and integrating human dimensions to improve conservation

Last modified: 
December 13, 2019 - 1:58pm
Type: Journal Article
Year of publication: 2017
Date published: 01/2017
Authors: Nathan Bennett, Robin Roth, Sarah Klain, Kai Chan, Patrick Christie, Douglas Clark, Georgina Cullman, Deborah Curran, Trevor Durbin, Graham Epstein, Alison Greenberg, Michael Nelson, John Sandlos, Richard Stedman, Tara Teel, Rebecca Thomas, Diogo Veríssimo, Carina Wyborn
Journal title: Biological Conservation
Volume: 205
Pages: 93 - 108
ISSN: 00063207

It has long been claimed that a better understanding of human or social dimensions of environmental issues will improve conservation. The social sciences are one important means through which researchers and practitioners can attain that better understanding. Yet, a lack of awareness of the scope and uncertainty about the purpose of the conservation social sciences impedes the conservation community's effective engagement with the human dimensions. This paper examines the scope and purpose of eighteen subfields of classic, interdisciplinary and applied conservation social sciences and articulates ten distinct contributions that the social sciences can make to understanding and improving conservation. In brief, the conservation social sciences can be valuable to conservation for descriptive, diagnostic, disruptive, reflexive, generative, innovative, or instrumental reasons. This review and supporting materials provides a succinct yet comprehensive reference for conservation scientists and practitioners. We contend that the social sciences can help facilitate conservation policies, actions and outcomes that are more legitimate, salient, robust and effective.

Freely available?: 
Summary available?: