Regulatory Assistance, Stakeholder Outreach, and Coastal and Marine Spatial Planning Activities In Support Marine and Hydrokinetic Energy Deployment

Last modified: 
December 14, 2019 - 11:19am
Type: Report
Year of publication: 2012
Date published: 09/2012
Authors: SH Geerlofs, LA Hanna, C Judd, KM Blake
Publishing institution: Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
City: Richland, WA
Series title: Environmental Effects of Marine and Hydrokinetic Energy
Document number: Task 2.1.7: Permitting and Planning Fiscal Year 2012 Year-End Report
Report number: PNNL-21876

This fiscal year 2012 year-end report summarizes activities carried out under DOE Water Power task 2.1.7, Permitting and Planning. Activities under Task 2.1.7 address the concerns of a wide range of stakeholders with an interest in the development of the MHK industry, including regulatory and resource management agencies, tribes, NGOs, and industry. Objectives for 2.1.7 are the following:

  • To work with stakeholders to streamline the MHK regulatory permitting process.
  • To work with stakeholders to gather information on needs and priorities for environmental assessment of MHK development.
  • To communicate research findings and directions to the MHK industry and stakeholders.
  • To engage in spatial planning processes in order to further the development of the MHK industry.

These objectives are met through three subtasks, each of which are described in this report:

  •—Regulatory Assistance
  •—Stakeholder Outreach
  •—Coastal and Marine Spatial Planning

As the MHK industry works with the regulatory community and stakeholders to plan, site, permit and license MHK technologies they have an interest in a predictable, efficient, and transparent process. Stakeholders and regulators have an interest in processes that result in sustainable use of ocean space with minimal effects to existing ocean users. Both stakeholders and regulators have an interest in avoiding legal challenges by meeting the intent of federal, state, and local laws that govern siting and operation of MHK technologies. The intention of work under 2.1.7 is to understand these varied interests, explore mechanisms to reduce conflict, identify efficiencies, and ultimately identify pathways to reduce the regulatory costs, time, and potential environmental impacts associated with developing, siting, permitting, and deploying MHK systems.

Freely available?: 
Summary available?: